One Woman's Writing Retreat: Interview

Interview

Alex Ross

Part II: How Novels and Scripts are Sold to Hollywood

by Catherine Tudor

Photo of Alex Ross.


Alex Ross

Educated at the universities of Heidelberg, Cambridge and a Grande Ecole in Paris, Alex Ross is fluent in four languages and has a working knowledge of another three.  He spent ten years as a Literary Agent, then Manager in Los Angeles. He started off in the M.G.M story department, then worked as a story analyst for Sally Field and Dick Clark. Subsequently he became an agent at the Gray/Goodman agency which represented Quentin Tarantino, Christopher De Vore (Elephant Man) & Mardik Martin (Raging Bull). He subsequently founded a management company, and discovered Andrew Niccol who wrote and produced The Truman Show and directed Gattaca. Sales of screenplays and books by writers discovered by the company having reached $8 Million, Alex sold his company in 1998. In 2000 he was asked to become a consultant to the National Academy of Writing of Great Britain, (headed by Lord Bragg). In addition to having been interviewed on prime time network TV by Dateline N.B.C, his career has been covered by: The Hollywood Reporter, Daily Variety, The Los Angeles Times, The New Yorker, Reuters, Newsday, The London Times, Daily Mail and others. Alex was recently featured as a panelist at the Las Vegas Screenwriting Conference.  He was also once invited to Buckingham Palace where he was presented with an award by His Royal Highness, The Prince Philip.

WriteMovies.com was named one of the 101 Best Web Sites for Writers by Writer's Digest Magazine in May, 2003. 

CT: Describe what Hollywood is like today. Are the big studios such as Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, and MGM still as powerful as they once were during the classic era of the studio system? What type of background does a writer need to get a job at one of those studios?

AR: It's a strange time to be answering this question as the whole town is getting ready for a major strike that is all about re-defining the old power boundaries. Writers are a lot more powerful than they used to be, actors run the town. The studios are still very powerful, but they are no longer about "film-making." Even in the '70s the executives would still leave the directors and producers alone to do their thing. Now it's all about "bankability," screenplays by committee and the "bottom line" i.e. keeping shareholders happy. Also, companies like New Line and Miramax have long eclipsed traditional ones such as MGM.

The notion of getting a studio job doesn't really exist anymore. What happens is that you write a script or book that the studio options. If you are lucky and have a good agent, you are attached to write several drafts of the screenplay. Very rarely do they not bring in a big hitter writer to re-write you. Often, this has less to do with the quality of the script but more with insecurities and the constant need to make a project sound more bankable i.e. a project that Steven Zaillian re-wrote has a better chance of getting a greenlight than one "just" written by A.N.Other.

CT: Do you recommend a writer always work with an agent? If so, how difficult is that to accomplish? How does the writer go about finding an agent? Should the agent be located in L.A.?

AR: It's not necessary. You can do it on your own, if you are really shrewd, or you can get a manager or lawyer to rep. you. Others go straight to producers, directors, actors. . . . At the end of the day it is always good to have somebody to play "good cop, bad cop" with and ALWAYS have a lawyer go over any contracts.

Finding an agent . . . the enigma of the 21st century. Enter a lot of writing contests, winning helps plus contact every one of them that accepts query letters and send them your stuff. Get a manager or lawyer, they have the right connections.

I recommend that your agent be located in L.A. especially if you are not. Out of town agents are simply not going to have the same level of relationships as locals.

CT: Describe a pitch session. Who is usually involved, what happens, where does the pitch take place?

AR: In the studio or at the production company. Depending on the power of your agent and your track record, you might end up pitching to the head of the company or the eighteen-year-old who usually makes the coffee. If you are not pitching to someone at the top of the food chain, you are wasting your time. Lower echelon development people rarely can get anything done and even more rarely, are prepared to fight for you.

The rule of thumb is, give them an outline of your project, some of your best scenes, be entertaining. If you see their eyes glazing over, change tack. If they respond to one particular aspect of your story, give them more. Usually ten minutes should do it, though I went on several pitch meetings with Sharon Stone's brother who did a perfect rendition of the entire screenplay in 50 minutes and never bored anyone!

CT: Do you ever recommend a writer cold call a producer?

AR: Absolutely! The odds are in your favor. Out of seven big shots you call, one will return your call. You only need one of those people to say "yes" and you are in business. If they say they don't take "unsolicited material" then explain to them that if they ask for it, it IS solicited! If they need representation, find a cheap attorney to do it for you. Be very careful about signing blanket release forms, if Hollywood does not have to pay you, it won't.

CT: Does a novelist have a better chance selling a published or self-published book to Hollywood or can an unpublished manuscript do just as well?

AR: The more heat on the project, the better. If you got published by one of the major houses and have a good story, they will call you. One of my clients published his manuscript himself (see the Dean Barrett article); the fact that it went out to people as an attractive hardback, made all the difference. Having said that, if your story is good and you get it to the right people, it will still sell and that will help you get a top of the line publishing deal.

CT: Why are articles sold to Hollywood?

AR: Because they are usually about an idea that can make a fascinating movie. Buying the rights to an article also means that they are buying the journalist's research, it gives the buyer a tangible hold on the material, hence discouraging others from jumping on the bandwagon.

CT: How does a writer approach independent film companies or off-Hollywood?

AR: Get a copy of the Hollywood Creative Directory and CALL until you are blue in the face. Be sure that you are prepared for the standard questions and have an interesting, brief and well worked out pitch to give them.

CT: Do you recommend a writer ever try to approach directors or actors with a script?

AR: Absolutely. Network until it hurts. Hang out on movie sets, at parties, agencies, be a total pest until someone gives you the time of day. Flatter people, make them think you care, remember their kids' names, birthdays, when they had the flu, where they went on holiday . . .

CT: Do writing contests work? How likely is a contest winner to see their work produced? Does winning a contest help on a writer's resume?

AR: Last time I checked, there must be over a hundred of these things. In all honesty, anything but the top twenty are a total waste of time and money. (Having said that, we do run one and yes, we are in the top twenty, Whew!)

If the people involved do not have major credits, just give you some prize money and nothing else, are based somewhere where there is little or no film making activity, have a badly designed site, have not been recommended by major entities (check Yahoo for instance, they list only a dozen), run for the hills! Winning a contest no one has heard of makes no difference whatsoever to your resume. Winning one of the bigger ones does.

The odds are still against your work getting made, but still, it will open doors, get you meetings maybe representation and the next project you come up with will have a much better reception. Studio executives love contests as they do all the hard work for them and present them simply with the best.

CT: What is an option? How long does an option last? Why would a writer get paid for an option if it never gets produced? How much money can an option make for a writer?

AR: An option is a contract that gives a producer the exclusive right to try to set up a project for a certain period of time. The period of time is usually one year, though many contracts have clauses that allow the contract to be extended by one or two years. Most times when you hear that a studio has acquired a script/book for $250,000 against $750,000, that means the $250,000 is the option money and the writer will only get the full amount on the first day of principal photography. Usually, the initial sum is considered deductible from the main, in other words, if you got the $250,000, they will only ever pay you another $500,000 later on.

The essence with options is that they are contract between the producer and writer that clearly define the parameters of their agreement. The sale price and all other "compensation" for the writer (points, re-write fees, credit, etc.) are clearly denoted, so that both parties are protected. All contracts that involve WGA signatories have to adhere to guidelines determined by the Guild.

(See: the Writers Guild of America Site)

Non-members have a lot more flexibility in their negotiations. For instance some producers are willing to put the time and effort to set up a first time writer's work, but could not afford the minimum 10% option moneys they would need to pay the writer according to WGA mandates. So both parties lose out if they had to stick to a guild contract. A lot of writers also make a very good money simply out of option agreements. Things get optioned over and over and they never get made. It must be one of the reasons that film making has become so expensive.

CT: Log line. Define it. Any tips for writing log lines?

AR: Log line, is basically more "development speak" for reducing a script or book to a few lines. In as few words as possible, reduce your script to a "genre" and try to highlight what makes your project stand out from all the rest and warrant it getting made. The worst thing you could do is to gush with a pile of hyperboly: "This is a really amazing project, with great characters, a brilliant role for Mel Gibson . . ." I see more of these than you would believe! Take the essence, the key idea of what makes your story tick and express it simply. Let "them" decide it's "amazing, brilliant" don't tell them, show them.

CT: Treatment. Define it. Who writes it, and why?

AR: Two schools of thought: One, believes that you should not start the screenplay without having worked out a very detailed treatment, including every beat, scratching of a nose, etc. This school believes that once this is in place, the screenplay writes itself. The other school believes that such a treatment stifles the creative process. Create a handful of unique characters, put them in an interesting situation and let them loose. If you have to edit out 200 pages of screenplay to get to the essence, so be it. The other use of treatments, is when a writer believes that he or she can get somebody interested enough in a project to pay them to script it on the basis of that treatment.

CT: What is the job of the story analyst?

AR: To, hopefully, seriously look for good material, prepare coverage (notes) on any he/she finds and have the guts to convince those higher in the food chain, of the merits of the project and really fight for it. Unfortunately, very often this is simply not the case. They tend to be frustrated writers, who are extremely critical of others' works and unwilling to see how something could be improved and made into a successful movie. Their credo tends to be: "Turn it down!" If they recommend something and upstairs does not like it, they could lose their job. If they don't recommend anything . . . I still have a copy of an analyst's report, who turned down Jurassic Park, claiming it had no hope of success. There should be a list made of people like that so that they never work in the industry again.

CT: Should a new writer try to stick to writing low-budget films, or go for the blockbuster?

AR: One is not necessarily easier to get made than the other. Go for the best idea that you come up with. The story itself will determine what direction it will go. Do not write an essentially low-budget story, then make it seem big, by adding a bunch of explosions. The last ten years have proven that one of the best ways to break in to the biz as a writer and director, is to make a micro budget movie and do it really well.

CT: How much does the format of a script matter? Any advice on where to find out more about how to properly format a screenplay?

AR: Very important. The tenet here is: "If it doesn't look professional, it can't be." You immediately seem suspicious if you use the wrong font, formatting, etc.  

CT: Why do writers often collaborate on a script?

AR: At times two writers complement each other's weaknesses. For instance, one is good with story, the other with dialogue. Other times, several writers are credited on a picture, but they were just appointed one after the other by the studio and never talked to each other. Remember, try not to team up with another writer just for one project, consider it as a marriage. If you sell something, you get a "quote" i.e. a price for your work (the going rate), that your agent will be able to leverage next time around to get you more. If you split up, you are right back to zero.

CT: How long can it take for a film to be made once production is underway?

AR: The studios really want production to be completed as soon as possible, as they hemorrhage money during the process (90 days is good). But movies like Town & Country, Lawrence of Arabia and Titanic still happen, whose production schedules have become legendary.

Part I

Relevant Links:

WriteMovies.com was listed in Writer's Digest's Scriptwriting Secrets as one of the top competitions for movie scripts.

 

No title

Home
Disclaimer

Prairie Den
Copyright 1996 - 2008, Prairie Den, LLC.